In re Sonny H. B.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: We reject the contention of respondent that Family Court should have suspended judgment when it terminated her parental rights. A suspended judgment “is a brief grace period designed to prepare the parent to be reunited with the child (Family Ct Act § 633)” and may be granted “where the court determines it is in the child’s best interests (Family Ct Act § 631)” (Matter of Michael B., 80 NY2d 299, 311). The record establishes that a suspended judgment in this case would not be in the best interests of the children. Rather, the record…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- In re Michael B.New York Court of Appeals · 1992
3Cited by8 opinions
- In re Ada M.R.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- In re Shanika F.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Bryce R.W. v. Orleans County Department of Social ServicesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- In re Shanika F.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- In re Philip Jaye J.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.