Wharton v. Long
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By FUNK, J.
The record discloses that plaintiff and his wife (the mother of said son) took their son to the office of defendant in Akron about 9 o’clock a. m. of Sept. 5, 1931, for the purpose of having the son’s tonsils and adenoids removed; that defendant performed said operation within an hour after said parents and son arrived at defendant’s office; that a general anaesthetic was given the child; that after the operation the child was placed in an emergency bed in the doctor’s office, where it remained .for several hours; that the parents remained there with their child, and then…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Corn v. FrenchNevada Supreme Court · 1955
- Buerger v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation & CorrectionOhio Court of Appeals · 1989
- Modrzynski v. LustOhio Court of Appeals · 1949
- Proctor v. Kewpee, 1-08-03 (10-6-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
- Roberts v. FargoOhio Court of Appeals · 1952
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.