Fagnani v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
PRENDERGAST, Judge.
The appellant was convicted of violating the prohibition law after an election had been held in Bowie County putting prohibition in force, since the statute was passed making it a felony to violate said law.
This is a companion ease to’Columbo v. State, and other cases from Bowie County, recently decided, wherein the main questions raised here, were raised in said other eases, and decided adversely to appellant. It is unnecessary, therefore, to restate any of these questions. We adhere to the decisions made therein on those points.
However, there are some minor questions…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Floeck v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1895
- Grayson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1896
- Davis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1903
3Cited by6 opinions
- Guerra v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
- Paulk v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1924
- Satterwhite v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1997
- Weaver v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1923
- Guerra v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.