Leach v. Hill
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Dallas District Oourt.- — Hon. Joiin A. Story, J uclge. In this case verdict and judgment were rendered against M. D.' Ilill, the Exchange Bank of Earlham, and Thomas Early for one hundred and nineteen dollars and five cents, in favor of the plaintiff, from which they appeal. The issues and facts appear in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
• Given, J.
1 I. The following facts, as shown by the pleadings and proofs, are undisputed: On and for some time prior to January 27, 1893, S. M. Leach was eashier of the Adel Bank, of Adel, and M. D. Hill was proprietor and cashier of the Exchange Bank of Earl-ham, at Earlham, Iowa. Thomas Early was a vman of ample means, residing at Earlham, and largely engaged in buying, shipping, and selling live stock. He transacted the principal part of his banking business in connection with the buying and selling of stock through said- Exchange Bank of Earlham. C. E. Sisson, though possessed of no…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Becker v. Keokuk WaterworksSupreme Court of Iowa · 1890
- Conyngham v. SmithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1864
- Watson v. ChesireSupreme Court of Iowa · 1865
- First National Bank v. Dubuque Southwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1879
- Taylor v. AdairSupreme Court of Iowa · 1867
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Carr Hardware Co. v. Chicago Bonding & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1921
- Boice v. CoffeenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1912
- Finch v. EnkeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1929
- Midwest National Bank & Trust Co. v. Niles & Watters Savings BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1921
- Montrose Savings Bank v. ClaussenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.