Legal Opinion

McElroy v. Filby

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 13, 1923No. Appeal, 280PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Porter, J.,

This is an action for the continuance of a nuisance. A verdict and judgment for the plaintiff in a former action in which the same matter was in controversy between the parties, were properly averred in the statement of plaintiff in the present case and offered in evidence at the trial. The trial of the present action in the court below resulted in a verdict and judgment in favor of the defendant, and the plaintiff appeals.

The plaintiff and the defendant are the owners and in possession of adjoining properties in the Borough of Marietta and the statement in the present…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ellis v. Academy of MusicSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1888
  2. Bell v. County of AlleghenySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1898
  3. Hartman v. Pittsburgh Incline Plane Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1894
  4. Hartman v. Pittsburg Incline Plane Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1899
  5. Smith v. ElliottSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1848

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Osterling v. FrickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  2. Getz v. FreedSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  3. McAllister v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  4. Friedman v. Parkway Baking Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API