Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

John Coffin v. Stacy Brandau

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided June 3, 2011No. 08-14538Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

BARKETT, Circuit Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part (joined by DUBINA, Chief Judge, and MARTIN, Circuit Judge):1

The majority’s opinion today does nothing less than eviscerate the once inviolate protections historically accorded the home by the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution. To accomplish this task, the majority ignores the most basic, bright-line principle of the Supreme Court’s Fourth Amendment jurisprudence: that warrantless searches and seizures occurring within the unambiguous physical dimensions of the home are presumptively unconstitutional. The…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
  2. Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Hope v. PelzerSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. United States v. United States District Court for the Eastern District of MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Kyllo v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API