Carlson v. Carlson

Smith, Judge.

This is an action for an equitable accounting and assumpsit for money had and received as well as the setting aside of certain deeds to property held by appellant. Appellant brings this appeal from the denial of her motion for a new trial and an adverse jury verdict of $58,000. The sole issue presented by this appeal is whether the verdict is “unreasonably and greatly in excess of the evidence.” We affirm.

Appellant contends that only $31,400 of the ward’s money was proven to have been received by her. However, there was evidence to the effect that most, if not all, of the money…