Legal Opinion

Patrick v. Alacer Corp.

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 16, 2011No. G044589PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

IKOLA, J.

We return to the long-running dispute regarding Alacer Corporation (Alacer), maker of the popular Emergen-C vitamin supplements. After company founder James W. “Jay” Patrick died in 2003, ample litigation ensued. Much involves Jay’s wife, plaintiff Ymelda T. Patrick, and her claim to Alacer stock held by his trust.

Plaintiff appeals from the judgment on her causes of action against Alacer, its directors, the trustees, and the trust beneficiaries. In a bifurcated declaratory relief cause of action, she asked the court to determine her community property interest in Alacer stock.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Pereira v. PereiraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Bullis v. Security Pacific National BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Van Camp v. Van CampCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  4. In Re Marriage of MooreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  5. In Re Marriage of MarsdenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Yeh v. Li-Cheng Tai, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  2. Brooks v. Brooks (In re Brooks), California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  3. Estate of Trikha CA4/3California Court of Appeal · 2020
  4. Marriage of BrooksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019
  5. Marriage of Goldfarb and Yelton CA1/2California Court of Appeal · 2013

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API