Legal Opinion

McMillan v. Joseph Decosimo and Co.

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided December 31, 1997No. 96-6981Published

1Opinion of the Court

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. No. 96-6981. In re DAS A. BORDEN & COMPANY, Debtor. Ed Leigh McMILLAN, II, Montford Companies, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. JOSEPH DECOSIMO AND COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant, Das A. Borden & Company, Defendant. Dec. 31, 1997. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama. (No. CV-94-G- 1572-NE), J. Foy Guin, Jr., Judge. Before HATCHETT, Chief Judge, and FAY and FARRIS*, Senior Circuit Judges. FAY, Senior Circuit Judge: Appellant Joseph Decosimo and Company ("Decosimo"), an accounting firm, appeals a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. In Re Arthur R. Miller and Janet E. Miller, Debtors. Equitable Bank v. Arthur R. Miller, and Janet E. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994
  2. In the Matter of Triangle Chemicals, Inc., Debtor. Darryl Fanelli v. Nelson T. Hensley, TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
  3. Otte v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. In re JarvisCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
  5. In Re James W. LAND & Lois L. Land, Debtors. James W. LAND, Lois L. Land & Thomas J. Kerwin, Appellants, v. FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF ALAMOSA, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API