Drafts v. State Highway Department
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1ConcurrenceJustice Cothran
(concurring in dismissal of petition) : In his order sustaining the demurrer to the complaint, his Honor, Judge Shipp, passed upon only one point: That the Act of 1925 (34 Stat. 287), was unconstitutional as violative of Const. Art. 3, §17, which provides:
“Every act or resolution having the force of law shall relate to but one subject, and that shall be expressed in the title.”
His ruling was the same in the case at bar as in the case of Scott v. Brookland, 139 S. C., 321; 138 S. E., 32, which was overruled by this Court.
The other questions raised in the petition for a rehearing were not…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Scott v. Town of BrooklandSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1927