Legal Opinion
Merritt-Chapman & Scott Corporation v. Wolfson
Superior Court of Delaware
Decided February 27, 1970PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STIFTEL, President Judge.
Merritt-Chapman & Scott Corporation seeks a declaratory judgment determining that the three defendants are not entitled to indemnification for legal fees under Delaware’s indemnification statutes. Defendants filed a counterclaim for indemnification and both sides moved for summary judgment. The issue is whether or not the defendants are entitled to be indemnified by the plaintiff corporation for attorneys’ fees and expenses incurred in the defense of a criminal action brought against them by virtue of their positions within the structure and operations of the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. HarrissSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Jordan v. De GeorgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- United States v. Gerardo A. Re, A/K/A Jerry A. Re, Gerard F. Re, Charles A. Casagrande, A/K/A Charles A. Grande and Ely BatkinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
- Mooney v. Willys-Overland Motors, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1953
3Cited by8 opinions
- Schmidt v. Magnetic Head Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Merritt-Chapman & Scott Corporation v. WolfsonSuperior Court of Delaware · 1974
- McLean v. AlexanderDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1978
- Green v. Westcap Corp. of DelawareSuperior Court of Delaware · 1985
- Galdi v. BergDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1973
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.