State v. Teipner
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Defendant was tried in the district court for Hennepin county before Koon, J., and a jury, on an indictment for rape, was convicted and sentenced to ten years’ imprisonment at hard labor, from which judgment he appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtBerry, J.
1. Defendant was indicted for rape, Evidence upon *536the trial tended to show that the crime was committed as charged upon the evening of November 7, 1885. A physician and surgeon, sworn for the prosecution, stated that she knew the prosecutrix, a girl about 16 years of age, and that she first saw her about noon of November 19th.
She was then asked — First, if she made an examination of her person at that time; and, second, in what condition she found her private parts. Both questions were objected to by defendant on account of the remoteness of the time of examination from the date of the rape.…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Ex parte DementSupreme Court of Alabama · 1875
- Simmons v. St. Paul & Chicago Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1872
3Cited by15 opinions
- People v. . O'SullivanNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
- State v. KingSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
- State v. DudleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1910
- State v. PetersonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1900
- Messel v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1911
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.