Legal Opinion

Monroe v. Collins

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided March 20, 1946No. 28765. Decree affirmedPublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Murphy

Plaintiff, James O. Monroe, is engaged in the business of printing and publishing in the city of Collinsville. Such business is subject to an occupational tax imposed under the Retailers’ Occupation Tax Act. (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1945, chap. 120, par. 440 et seq.) On behalf of himself and other retailers of the State, he started this suit in the circuit court of Madison county against Philip W. Collins, Director of Revenue, and the Department of Revenue of the State. The prayer of the complaint was that the said Director and Department be enjoined (a) from collecting any of the tax imposed by the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hans v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Schwing v. MilesIllinois Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Noorman v. Department of PubLic Works & BuildingsIllinois Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Joos v. Illinois National GuardIllinois Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Posinski v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1941

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Sass v. KramerIllinois Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Moline Tool Co. v. Department of RevenueIllinois Supreme Court · 1951
  3. People v. Illinois Toll Highway CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1954
  4. City of Kenosha v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  5. People Ex Rel. Scott v. Chicago Park DistrictIllinois Supreme Court · 1976

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API