Legal Opinion

Yeargin v. . Siler

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 5, 1880PublishedCited by 7 opinions

MotioN to dismiss an action heard at June Term, 1880, of Wake Superior Court, before Gudger, J. Upon the facts set out in the opinion, the motion was allowed and the plaintiff appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtDillard, J.

By the act of J 872-73, ch. 1, and other subsequent acts, the county of- Wake has four regular terms of the superior court in a year, of which two are return terms for all original and final process in civil causes, to-wit, February and August terms, and by the act of 1876-77, ch, 85, §3, a summons issued more than ten days before its return term, if executed within the ten days, is directed to.be-placed on the'summons docket and continued to the next term of the court at which it shall be treated as if said next term had been the return term thereof.

The plaintiff in this case sued out his…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Abrams v. ErvinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1859
  2. Rowland v. . Thompson v. .Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1871

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Styers v. . Forsyth CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  2. Borders v. . ClineSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  3. Borders v. ClineSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  4. Jamesville & Washington Railroad v. FisherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
  5. Griffin v. BarnesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API