Legal Opinion

In Re Gore

Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)

Decided December 12, 2007No. 04-07-00597-CVPublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion by

STEVEN C. HILBIG, Justice.

Kevin Gore seeks a writ of mandamus to compel the trial court to (1) vacate its order abating a civil forfeiture action until several criminal prosecutions are completed and (2) order the State to provide discovery. We hold the trial court abused its discretion by abating the case and therefore conditionally grant the requested writ in part.

Factual and Procedural Background

In March 2006, the State of Texas filed a civil action against Gore pursuant to Chapter 59 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure seeking forfeiture of personal property the State…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Moody v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
  2. In Re Ramirez, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1998
  3. Gebhardt v. Gallardo, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1995
  4. Hobson v. MooreTexas Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Trapnell v. Hunter, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1990

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. In Re Immobiliere Jeuness Establissement, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2014
  2. In re SummersettCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2013
  3. In re Grecon, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2018
  4. In re ShulmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2017
  5. $1,608.00 in U.S. Currency and 2008 Mazda, VIN 1YVHP80C385M37457 v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2015

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API