Legal Opinion

Loporto v. Druiss Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 21, 1934PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Malley, J.

We are of opinion that the provisions of section 1077-a of the Civil Practice Act, construed in connection with section 1077-e, apply to actions brought before the effective date of the statute, even though predicated on defaults other than payment of principal or installments of principal, when such other defaults have been cured within thirty days after the act went into effect. It appears that the defendant had either made good these defaults or tendered the amount thereof within the thirty-day period. It was, therefore, entitled to the benefit of the remedial legislation and a dismissal…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Vogel v. EdwardsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
  2. City Savings Bank v. PriorNew York Supreme Court · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API