Front Range Feedlots, LLC v.
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the Court
court application; (3) the State Engineer properly attached the SWSP terms and conditions to Front Range, rather than to the water rights at issue; (4) the State Engineer had jurisdiction to require the replacement of depletions from pre-application pumping; and (5) the water court properly exercised its discretion in ordering Front Range to acquire additional replacement sources. In addition, the court concludes that the Engineers are entitled to recover reasonable attorney fees and costs under section 37-92-503(1)(b), C.R.S. (2022), including those incurred in the appeal in case no.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Specialty Restaurants Corp. v. NelsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 2010
- Simpson v. Bijou Irrigation Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2003
- UMB Bank, N.A. v. Landmark Towers Ass'nSupreme Court of Colorado · 2017
- Well Augmentation Subdistrict of Central Colorado Water Conservancy District v. City of AuroraSupreme Court of Colorado · 2009
- v. MeagherSupreme Court of Colorado · 2020
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.