Legal Opinion
State v. Raheem
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided June 26, 1984No. 84 KA 0094PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CRAIN, Judge.
Defendants, Jameelah Raheem and Tahir Raheem, were charged with Possession with the Intent to Distribute Pentazocine (Count I) and Possession with the Intent to Distribute Phenmetrazine (Count II) on September 8, 1982, in violation of La.R.S. 40:967(A).1 Each defendant pled not *216guilty. After a trial by jury, responsive verdicts of guilty of Possession of Pentazo-cine (Count I) and guilty of Possession of Phenmetrazine (Count II) were returned as to each defendant. The trial court sentenced each defendant to three years in the custody of the Department of Corrections on each…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- State v. CaptvilleSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1984
- State v. KormanLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1983
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. RaheemSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1985
- State v. RaheemSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1984