Legal Opinion

State v. Brown

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 20, 1989No. Nos. 88-2303, 88-2324PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The State appeals from a court-offered sentence which departed downward from the applicable sentencing guidelines. The sole written reason for the trial court’s guideline departure was: “small quantity [of] contraband.” We reverse and remand for resentencing.

The Florida Supreme Court has ruled that the quantity of drugs involved in a crime is not a proper reason to support departure from the sentencing guidelines. Atwaters v. State, 519 So.2d 611 (Fla.1988). This court has applied the Atwaters rule to downward departures from the sentencing guidelines. State v. Forbes, 536 So.2d 356 (Fla. 3d…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Shull v. DuggerSupreme Court of Florida · 1987
  2. Atwaters v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1988
  3. State v. ForbesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
  4. State v. McClusterDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. SingletaryDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API