Legal Opinion

American Foreign Industries Judson Sheldon Int'l Corp. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided February 29, 1972No. C.D. 4335Published

1Opinion of the Court

Maletz, Judge:

In these protests, plaintiffs challenge the government’s duty assessment on certain hand-carved polyester articles that were invoiced as vases (emerald, lapis, sapphire, amethyst, etc.) and flying horses (jade green, lapis, amethyst, agate, etc.). The articles— which were imported from Hong Kong via San Francisco in 1962— were classified by the government under paragraph 233 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified, by similitude to “articles composed wholly or in chief value of agate, rock crystal, or other semiprecious stone” and assessed duty at the rate of 42*4 percent.

Challeng…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Murphy v. ArnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Ignaz Strauss & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960
  3. United States v. GodillotCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
  4. United States v. EcksteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  5. Alex W. Block Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API