Legal Opinion

People v. Becker

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided December 2, 2010No. 108986 RelPublishedCited by 115 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Karmeier

Chief Justice Kilbride and Justices Freeman, Thomas, Garman, Burke, and Theis concurred in the judgment and opinion.

OPINION

The principal issue presented for review in this appeal is whether the trial court abused its discretion when it excluded, at trial, the expert testimony of Dr. Katherine Okla, concerning the reliability/credibility of hearsay statements made by O.B., the alleged child victim of a sexual assault. The court had deemed the statements “reliable” — and thus admissible at trial — following a pretrial hearing conducted pursuant to the provisions of section 115 — 10 of the Code…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. People v. IllgenIllinois Supreme Court · 1991
  2. People v. GilliamIllinois Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Snelson v. KammIllinois Supreme Court · 2003
  4. People v. EnisIllinois Supreme Court · 1990
  5. People v. HallIllinois Supreme Court · 2000

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by115 opinions

  1. People v. PetersonIllinois Supreme Court · 2017
  2. People v. PikesIllinois Supreme Court · 2013
  3. People v. LermaIllinois Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Ronald Ruhl v. Marcus HardyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
  5. People v. InmanAppellate Court of Illinois · 2023

110 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API