Legal Opinion

Nesbitt, Inc. v. Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 28, 1942No. 18881PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By MORGAN, J.

■

In 1933 the Board of Education of the School District of Norwalk, Ohio, decided to erect a new high school building. On application, the Public Works Administration of the United States granted the Board $126,000.00 which was substantially 457> of the cost of the building. The voters of Norwalk, Ohio, approved a bond issue of $148,500.00, sufficient to meet the remainder of the cost of the building. Bids were called for and E. M. Withers, d.b.a., The Withers Company, was awarded the “plumbing, heating and ventilating.” The .plaintiff was a sub-contractor who agreed to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Illinois Surety Co. v. United States Ex Rel. PeelerSupreme Court of the United States · 1916

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Baltimore County Department of Education v. Henry A. Knott, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
  2. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Hamilton & Spiegel, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
  3. Joseph J. Hock, Inc. v. Baltimore Contractors, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1969
  4. Johnson Service Co. v. American Casualty Co., Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Franklin County, Civil Division1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API