Legal Opinion

Craig v. Michigan Lubricator Co.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided July 6, 1897No. 414PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Michigan.

1Opinion of the Court

SAGE, District Judge.

This appeal is from a decree dismissing bill for alleged infringement of letters patent Ho. 398,583, issued to W. H. Craig, February 29, 1889, for an improvement in steam-engine lubricators. See 72 Fed. 173.

The defendants are the Michigan Lubricator Company and Frank W. Marvin, as its president and individually. By stipulation, Max Uathan was made a party complainant, because of certain rights held by him under the patent. The suit was not pressed against Marvin, and no appeal was taken :from the dismissal of the bill as to him. The bill, which is in the usual form,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Craig v. Michigan Lubricator Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Michigan · 1896

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. City of South Omaha v. SutliffeNebraska Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Knight v. Union Hardware Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API