Legal Opinion
Kramer v. Jotun Paints, Inc.
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided February 12, 2002No. CIV.S 02-134, CIV.S 02-135PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
SMALKIN, Chief Judge.
These related Title VII cases are before the Court on the defendant’s motions to dismiss, which the plaintiffs have opposed. Neither further briefing nor oral argument is needed. Local Rule 105.6 (D.Md.2001).
These cases were both commenced by complaints filed in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City close to the 90th day after receipt of the plaintiffs’ notices of right to sue. Both complaints were filed on June 4, 2001 — the day of Ms. McCauley’s deadline and ten days before Ms. Kramer’s deadline. On June 5, 2001, the Circuit Court issued summonses to…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Irwin v. Department of Veterans AffairsSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Zipes v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Baldwin County Welcome Center v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Crown, Cork & Seal Co. v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Albert Nealey v. Transportacion Maritima Mexicana, S. A. And Maersk LinesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Knickman v. Prince George's CountyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2002