Commonwealth v. Miner
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
COLVILLE, J.:
This case is an appeal from the order denying Appellant’s petition under the Post Conviction Relief Act (“PCRA”). Appellant raises several issues regarding the alleged ineffectiveness of his trial counsel. We affirm the order.
Appellant was convicted of six sex-related offenses involving multiple complainants. On direct appeal, this Court affirmed his judgment of sentence. Commonwealth v. Miner, 927 A.2d 655 (Pa.Super.2007). Appellant filed a PCRA petition but did not obtain relief in the PCRA court. On appeal to this Court, he filed a pro se petition alleging the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Commonwealth v. JetteSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- Commonwealth v. CoxSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Commonwealth v. ClarkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- Commonwealth v. BurnsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Commonwealth v. BattleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by75 opinions
- Com. v. Stansbury, K.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
- Commonwealth v. BrownSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- Com. v. Stansbury, K.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
- Com. v. Armstrong, A.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2022
- Com. v. Bailey, C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.