Legal Opinion

Bell v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 23, 1996No. CR 95-417PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Counsel file a belated motion for attorney’s fees more than five months after the mandate was issued in this appeal. Counsel’s reason for filing late was based on their impression that, because this court reversed this case with directions for a suppression hearing, they believed their services for appeal purposes would not end until the suppression hearing had been conducted. Counsel offer no citation of authority to support their belief, and we know of none. Alternatively, counsel request payment of fees for services rendered prior to the issuance of the mandate.

To be awarded attorney’s…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cristee v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1982
  2. Stefanovich v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1984
  3. Fiveash v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1984
  4. Houston v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1993
  5. Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1993

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Jones v. JonesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API