Finkel 182486 v. Naphcare LLC
District Court, D. Arizona
1Opinion
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Brian Leslie Finkel, No. CV-23-02501-PHX-KML (JFM) 10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 v. 12 Naphcare LLC, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 Magistrate Judge James F. Metcalf denied plaintiff Brian Leslie Finkel’s request to 16 extend the deadline for filing discovery motions. (Doc. 127.) Finkel appeals that denial 17 claiming it was “contrary to established law and should be overturned.” (Doc. 131 at 1.) It 18 was not. 19 While proceeding before the magistrate judge, Finkel filed a motion for sanctions. 20 That motion was…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Durham Ex Rel. Durham v. County of MauiDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2010