Legal Opinion

Magin v. Lamb

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 28, 1890PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal by defendant Lamb (impleaded with Marcellas Pitts and others) from a judgment of the district court for Blue Earth county, where the action (brought to set aside a judgment of $122.35) was-tried by Severance, J.

1Opinion of the CourtDickinson, J.

The defendant Lamb is the assignee of a judgment' heretofore entered in the district court in favor of Pitts and others-against Anton Magin. The plaintiff, alleging that no summons was-ever served upon him in that action, that he did not appear therein,, and did not know of the judgment until its enforcement was attempted,, prosecutes this action to have the judgment set aside, and to enjoin its enforcement. It is conceded and claimed on both sides that this-judgment is to be deemed as having been entered against this plaintiff, against whom the defendants were proceeding to enforce it…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ferguson v. . CrawfordNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  2. Johnson v. ColemanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1868
  3. Jeffery v. FitchSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1879
  4. Heffner v. GunzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1882
  5. Arnold v. HawleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1885

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Smoot v. JuddSupreme Court of Missouri · 1904
  2. Massachusetts Benefit Life Ass'n v. LohmillerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1896
  3. Freeman v. WoodNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Vaule v. MillerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
  5. Phelps v. McCollamNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1901

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API