Legal Opinion
Kirsch v. Prince George's County
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
Decided July 8, 1992No. 1653, September Term, 1991PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MOYLAN, Judge.
The appellants, Donald P. Kirsch, Martha Kaye Dunn, Stephanie Stockman and Daniel Cones, appeal an Order of Judge Larnzell Martin in the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County granting the Motion for Summary Judgment by the appellee, Prince George’s County. The appellants essentially raise two contentions:
1) That the Prince George’s County Zoning Ordinance CB-152-1989 violates the Prince George’s County Human Relations Act; and
2) That the Ordinance deprives the appellants of the equal protection of the laws in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Moore v. City of East ClevelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Village of Belle Terre v. BoraasSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Murphy v. EdmondsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Kirsch v. Prince George's CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
- Kirsch v. Prince George's CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993