Van Norden Trust Co. v. L. Rosenberg, Inc.
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Appeal by the defendant L. Rosenberg, Incorporated, from a judgment of the City Court of the city of Rew York, entered upon the verdict of a jury, and from an order denying such defendant’s motion to set aside the verdict and for a new trial.
1Opinion of the CourtGiegerich, J.
The action is upon a promissory note, dated September 21, 1901, made to their own order by tb defendants Lazarus Perelson and Louis Rosenberg, const i tuting the copartnership of Perelson & Rosenberg, for the sum of $1,500, payable on demand at the Van Rorden Trust Company, Ro. 420 Grand street, borough of Manhattan.
The complaint alleges that the defendants Perelson and Rosenberg and the defendant L. Rosenberg, Incorporated, a domestic corporation, indorsed and delivered the note in suit to the plaintiff for the purpose of giving credit thereto with the plaintiff and each with the intent to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Martin v. Niagara Falls Paper Manufacturing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Youngs v. PerryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
- Archer v. . City of Mount VernonNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
- Conant v. American Rubber Tire Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
- Fox v. New York Central & Hudson River RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hellenic Lines Limited v. WinklerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1966
- Starley v. Deseret Foods CorporationUtah Supreme Court · 1938
- Southland Greyhound Lines, Inc. v. TaggartCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
- S. Brody Trading Corp. v. Manufacturers Trust Co.City of New York Municipal Court · 1932
- Wuestefeld v. Albert, Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Hamilton County1916