Legal Opinion

Davis v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided October 4, 1988No. 71A04-8802-CR-38PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CONOVER, Presiding Judge.

Defendant-Appellant James Davis, III (Davis), appeals his conviction for burglary.

We affirm.

Davis presents three issues for our review. Restated, they are:

1. whether Davis had a constitutional right to compel a witness to appear and be called before the jury when he knew the witness intended to invoke his Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination,

2. whether Davis was denied his constitutional rights when the trial court refused to compel a witness's presence in court for the purpose of identification and comparison, and

8. whether the trial court erred in…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Washington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. United States v. Valenzuela-BernalSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. United States v. Herman Tyrone HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976
  5. United States v. Emanuel JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1973

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Dayhuff v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. Duso v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. Taylor v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. Ferguson v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. Klagiss v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API