Legal Opinion

Burrow v. Berry

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 10, 1924No. 8 Div. 577PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSomervilee, J.

In Ex parte Ashurst, 100 Ala. 573, 13 South. 542, wherein the right of a respondent to amend his answer to a bill in equity after submission of the cause was involved, the decision of this court is thus correctly stated in the fourth headnote:

“The right to set up any matter of defense includes the privilege to meet any state of the evidence authorizing relief, and averments of an unsworn answer cannot, even after publication of the evidence and the submission on agreement as to certain facts, be retained against respondent’s motion to strike them out, on the ground that complainant will so be…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. London v. G. L. Anderson Brass WorksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  2. Ex parte AshurstSupreme Court of Alabama · 1892

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Alabama Water Co. v. City of AnnistonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
  2. Henry v. WhiteSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  3. Burrow v. BerrySupreme Court of Alabama · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API