Legal Opinion

Tornheim v. Appeals Board

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 29, 2011PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The determination of the Administrative Law Judge that the petitioner violated Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1225-c (2) (a) is supported by substantial evidence (see Matter of Desvignes v State of N.Y. Dept. of Motor Vehs., 71 AD3d 766 [2010]; Matter of Hall v Swartz, 61 AD3d 868 [2009]). The Appeals Board of the New York State Department of Motor Vehicles properly declined to consider evidence that was not presented at the hearing, but instead, was presented for the first time on the petitioner’s administrative appeal (see Matter of Charles Birdoff & Co. v New York State Div. of Hous. &…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Charles Birdoff & Co. v. New York State Division of Housing & Community RenewalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  2. Lloyd Hall v. SwartzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  3. Desvignes v. State of New York Department of Motor VehiclesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Matter of Hickey v. New York State Dept. of Motor Vehs.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
  2. Matter of Matievskaya v. State of New York Dept. of Motor VehiclesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API