Legal Opinion

Highland v. Chas. H. Lilly Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1933No. 24751. Department TwoPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGeraghty, J.

Action by plaintiff, Anders Highland, against Chas. H. Lilly Company, a corporation, and J. L. Poitras and wife, defendants, to recover damages for personal injuries suffered by plaintiff when struck by a car owned by the Lilly Company and driven by its co-defendant, Poitras. From a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon the verdict of a jury, the defendants appeal.

Holman road No. 1 runs southwesterly toward the city of Seattle. Its roadbed is sixty-five feet in width, but the westerly side only is paved. This paved strip is twenty feet wide. Outside the pavement is a five-foot shoulder,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Barach v. Island Empire Telephone & Telegraph Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Hanson v. EilersWashington Supreme Court · 1931

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Scalf v. EicherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  2. Bergstrom v. OveWashington Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Becker v. Tacoma Transit Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Bergstrom v. OveWashington Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Dimick v. LinnellOregon Supreme Court · 1965

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API