Legal Opinion

Huckleberry v. Riddle

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1868PublishedCited by 2 opinions

APPEAL from tbe Clarice Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtFrazer, J.

This was a suit for partition. The complaint was in two paragraphs. The first alleged that the *455plaintiff' Mary and defendant (appellant) were the only-heirs at law of their deceased father, Martin Huckleberry, who died intestate in 1866, seized of certain lands in Clarke county; that in 1849, the intestate was induced by the defendant to execute a conveyance of the premises to the defendant; that said deed was wholly without consideration; that when said deed was made, the deceased was incapable of making a contract, or taking care of his estate, by reason of great age and failing mind, and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Philadelphia & Trenton Railroad v. StimpsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1840
  2. Patton v. HamiltonIndiana Supreme Court · 1859
  3. Wright v. GaffIndiana Supreme Court · 1855
  4. Dearmond v. DearmondIndiana Supreme Court · 1859

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Frenzel v. MillerIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
  2. Davis v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1871

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API