Legal Opinion

Martin v. CNH AMERICA LLC

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided November 16, 2007No. 97,707Published

1Opinion of the Court

Marquardt, J.:

James E. Martin appeals the denial of workers compensation benefits. We affirm.

Martin began working for Case New Holland (CNH) in 1987. In 2002, he began assembly work which required getting underneath cars on a creeper, bending, getting on his knees, twisting, turning, squatting, and stooping. Martin began to notice right hip problems in May 2004. Martin was unsure whether the pain was work-related and recalled no specific incident of injury. After visiting several doctors, Martin was eventually diagnosed with avascular (or aseptic) necrosis of both hips and received hip…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Nance v. Harvey CountySupreme Court of Kansas · 1997
  2. Fieser v. Kansas State Board of Healing ArtsSupreme Court of Kansas · 2006
  3. Boeckmann v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1972
  4. Martin v. Unified School District No. 233Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1980
  5. Coleman v. Swift-EckrichSupreme Court of Kansas · 2006

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API