State v. Roya
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the Court
The State brings this interlocutory appeal from a district court order that granted defendant’s request to depose two minor witnesses about prior sexual abuse by other family members. The State argues that 13 VS.A. § 3255(c) prohibits a defendant from questioning a complaining witness during a deposition about prior sexual conduct. Further, the State contends that this prohibition does not violate defendant’s rights to confrontation or due process. We hold that defendant has failed to show that applying § 3255(c) in this case violates his constitutional rights, and therefore, we reverse.
Defend…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. PulizzanoWisconsin Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. ReadSupreme Court of Vermont · 1996
- State v. PercySupreme Court of Vermont · 1988
- State v. DunbarSupreme Court of Vermont · 1989
- Sachs v. SachsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1995
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. RehkopSupreme Court of Vermont · 2006
- State v. HanceSupreme Court of Vermont · 2006
- Athens School District v. Vermont State Board of EducationSupreme Court of Vermont · 2020
- State v. Wesco, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2006