Spring v. Bluestem Brands, Inc.
District Court, D. Nevada
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 8 9 JAMES FRANCIS SPRING, Case No. 2:20-cv-02212-GMN-NJK 10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 v. [Docket No. 8] 12 BLUESTEM BRANDS, INC., 13 Defendant. 14 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for attorney fees and reimbursement of costs 15 for service of process. Docket No. 8. Defendant did not file a response, and the time to do so has 16 now passed. See Docket. The motion is properly resolved without a hearing. See Local Rule 78- 17 1. For the reasons discussed more fully below, the Court GRANTS in part and DENIES in part 18…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Pennsylvania v. Delaware Valley Citizens' Council for Clean AirSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Camacho v. Bridgeport Financial, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Gates v. DeukmejianCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.