Legal Opinion

Employment of Mine Foremen

Pennsylvania Department of Justice

Decided January 17, 1940Published

1Opinion of the Court

Rial, Deputy Attorney General,

Your letter of November 22,1939, raises a question as to the employment of mine foremen in bituminous coal mines. This may be stated as follows:

Where a number of co-owners or a partnership.owns and operates a bituminous coal mine and five men or more are actually engaged in the mining of the coal, either as co-owners or co-owners and employes, does the Bituminous Coal Act of June 9, 1911, P. L. 756, in article IV, sec. 1, as amended by the Act of June 1,1915, P. L. 716, sec. 2, and as amended by the Act of July 1, 1937, P. L. 2486, sec. 4, 52 PS §871, require the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Ritchie v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
  2. United States v. MorrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1840
  3. Durkin v. Kingston Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
  4. Reeder v. Lehigh Valley Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1911
  5. Wolcutt v. Erie Coal & Coke Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1910

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API