McDonald v. McDonald
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSchbeibeb, J.
The action is by plaintiff husband for a separation and a permanent injunction. Defendant wife has appeared generally. During the pendency of the action, defendant commenced a Florida divorce action and plaintiff, who has not appeared in the Florida action, now moves this court to enjoin that suit pendente lite.
Following the impact of Williams v. North Carolina (317 U. S. 287) upon Goldstein v. Goldstein (283 N. Y. 146) relief in this nature has been granted by our courts. (See cases collated in Wolman v. Wolman, 182 Misc. 602.) However, in my opinion, the power of the court in this regard is…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Williams v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Goldstein v. GoldsteinNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
- May v. MayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931
- Jones v. JonesNew York Supreme Court · 1943
- Wolman v. WolmanNew York Supreme Court · 1944
3Cited by7 opinions
- Kleinschmidt v. KleinschmidtAppellate Court of Illinois · 1951
- Dominick v. DominickNew York Supreme Court · 1960
- Palmer v. PalmerNew York Supreme Court · 1945
- Brown v. BrownSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1978
- Gilmore v. GilmoreNew York Supreme Court · 1945
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.