Moore v. Small
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
In error from the District Court of Allegheny. The case is stated at length in the opinion of this court.
1Opinion of the CourtBurnside, J.
The plaintiff in error was plaintiff below. He claimed the lot in question, under the entry of one Ray, in 1817 or 1818, and the building of a small dwelling-house thereon. There was at that time a small blacksmith shop on another part of the lot. Ray sold to the plaintiff for a valuable consideration, in 1819, who entered and continued in possession until 1829 or 1830, when he leased to Small, the defendant, who *195entered and continued in possession from that period until the trial of this cause. It was admitted that the property was assessed to the plaintiff, Moore, from 1819 to 1837.
The…
2Cited by1 opinion
- Lessee of Howard v. PollockSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1795