Legal Opinion

Pierce v. LaVallee

District Court, N.D. New York

Decided May 11, 1962No. Civ. 7813, 7815 and 7816PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRENNAN, Chief Judge.

The background of these actions, brought to declare and enforce the plaintiffs’ rights pertaining to the exercise of their religious beliefs, is found in the decision reported under the name of Pierce v. LaVallee, 293 F.2d 233. The three issues raised in the plaintiffs’ complaints were disposed of as follows.

The plaintiffs’ right to purchase and possess the Quran was disposed of in the above decision. Plaintiffs’ contention as to their right to contact a “spiritual ad-visor” was abandoned. The third claim for relief was remanded to this court in the following language. “…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Brown v. McGinnisNew York Court of Appeals · 1962

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Sostre v. McGinnisCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
  2. Walker v. BlackwellCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
  3. Roberts v. PepersackDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1966
  4. Desmond v. BlackwellDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1964
  5. O'Lone v. Estate of ShabazzSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API