Legal Opinion

38 Town Associates v. Barr

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 11, 1996PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

The plaintiff, a partner of the defendants, brought this action to recover the proceeds of an alleged loan made to the partnership. The defendants moved to dismiss the action, asserting, in essence, that the alleged loan was in fact a capital contribution. The Supreme Court granted the motion to dismiss.

The Supreme Court erred in granting the motion to dismiss. The partnership agreement does not by its terms clearly rule out loans by partners to the partnership. Accordingly, its provisions are subject to interpretation and inquiry as to the intent of the partners who entered into the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Jackson Heights Medical Group, P. C. v. Complex Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  2. Chaim Ben-Dashan v. PlittAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
  3. Icon Motors, Inc. v. Empire State Datsun, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  4. Hynes v. BarrAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hynes v. BarrAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API