Legal Opinion

Alliance Mutual Casualty Co. v. Scheufler

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 12, 1969No. 45,303PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hatcher, C.:

This appeal stems from a controversy over the rights of an agent, who had defaulted by failing to account to his insurance companies for premiums he had collected, to the agency’s expiration records.

The trial court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law were in-favor of the plaintiffs on all issues.

The defendant, C. F. Scheufler, became an insurance agent for each of the plaintiffs at Hoisington, Kansas, by contracts dated July 11, 1956, each of which contract provides insofar as material here:

*172“The Agent agrees that all premiums reveived…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Mays v. Middle Iowa Realty Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1969
  2. Farmers Equity Coöperative Ass'n v. TiceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1926
  3. Brinkman v. Empire Gas & Fuel Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1926
  4. Coder v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas · 1943
  5. McGregor v. Farmers State Bank of WashingtonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In Re: Daniels-Head & AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  2. Dugan v. First Nat'l Bank in WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1980
  3. Kline v. OrebaughSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974
  4. Saint Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. Roy A. Dart Insurance Agency (In Re Roy A. Dart Insurance Agency)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 1980
  5. Daniels-Head & Associates v. William M. Mercer, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API