Legal Opinion
Ruston State Bank & Trust Co. v. Theodus
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided December 6, 1978No. 13795PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HALL, Judge.
This suspensive appeal by defendant is from an order denying him a jury trial of all issues in this suit on a continuing guaranty agreement. The trial court’s order, grounded on LSA-C.C.P. Art. 1733(2), limits the issues to be tried by the jury to the pleaded defenses of fraud, error and want or failure of consideration; all other issues to be determined by the judge.
It appearing that the appeal is from an order which is neither a final judgment nor an interlocutory order which may cause irreparable injury, this court notified counsel for appellant to show cause why the appeal…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Bunkie Bank & Trust Co. v. Avoyelles Parish Pol.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1977
- Guidroz v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1976
- Sonnier v. Gray Tool Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1978
- Wilson Sporting Goods Co. v. AlwesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1944
- Millet v. JohnsonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1977
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bernard v. Allstate Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1981
- STATE, DEPT. OF TRANSP. & DEV. v. WilliamsonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1990
- Hunter v. Health & Social & RehabilitationLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1979
- Ruston State Bank & Trust Co. v. TheodusLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1979
- Ruston State Bank & Trust Co. v. TheodusSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1979