Legal Opinion

Bank of the State v. Hinchcliffe

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided July 15, 1842PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Hinchcliffe moved to dismiss this appeal, for want of a legal affidavit, preliminary to taking the appeal.

1Opinion of the Court

By ike Court,

Ringo, C. J.

That the filing of an affidavit, as prescribed by law, constituted a condition precedent to the right of the party to appeal to this Court, in the present case, there can be no doubt; because the statute expressly declares, that, in civil cases, no appeal shall be allowed “from any final judgment or decision of any circuit court,” unless the appeal be made during the term at which the judgment or decision complained of was given; and the appellant, or his agent, shall, during the term, file in the Court an affidavit, stating that such appeal is not made for vexation…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Baker v. CuretonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  2. Tharp v. BarnettSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910
  3. Worley v. River Oaks Water Improvement District No. 48Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1999
  4. Swiney v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Sykes v. LafferrySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1871

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API