Legal Opinion

Cochran v. Scherer

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided January 15, 1922PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Motion by plaintiff for order striking out answer and for summary judgment.

1Opinion of the CourtLauer, J.

This is a motion made on behalf of the plaintiff for an order striking out the defendant’s answer and for summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff against the defendant pursuant to rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice. Before considering the merits of the motion and the sufficiency of the defense as presenting an issue, the question is presented as to whether the Rules of Civil Practice apply to the Municipal Court.

Under the provisions of section 15 of the Municipal Court Code it would seem that there could be no question about this, and there would be no doubt about it but for the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Edgar A. Levy Leasing Company, Inc. v. . SiegelNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
  2. Mitchell v. SchroederAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1916
  3. Mitchell v. SchroederAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. FeigelIndiana Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Vesell v. ReisfieldCity of New York Municipal Court · 1934
  3. State v. FeigelIndiana Supreme Court · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API