Van Guilder v. Van Guilder

The reasons of appeal attacking conclusions of the court drawn from the subordinate facts, are without merit. These conclusions were legally and logically drawn from the subordinate facts, and were therefore justified.

Upon the trial the plaintiff claimed, and offered evidence to prove, that her husband, on October 22d, 1909, made a quitclaim deed of the premises in question to one Hubbard, and had Hubbard draw a like deed to the plaintiff, and that the husband on the same day-delivered both deeds to the plaintiff, saying to her at the delivery that he had turned the property over to her and…