Legal Opinion

Breeland v. Yale & Towne Manufacturing Co.

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided July 19, 1960No. Civ. A. No. 60-C-190PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ABRUZZO, District Judge.

The defendant excepts to interrogatories propounded by the plaintiff to the defendant upon the ground that they cause annoyance, expense, embarrassment or oppression to the defendant and are irrelevant and immaterial. There are 58 numbered interrogatories propounded and most of these 58 contain a number of subdivisions so that the total number propounded exceeds 200.

When the motion was argued the Court asked counsel for the plaintiff if he was going to examine the defendant before trial after the interrogatories were answered and counsel gave an affirmative answer.

In…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Aktiebolaget Vargos v. ClarkDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1949
  2. Schotthofer v. Hagstrom Construction Co.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 1958
  3. Riss & Co. v. Association of American RailroadsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1959
  4. Frankson v. Carter & Weeks Stevedoring Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1949

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Roesberg v. Johns-Manville Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1980
  2. Sprint Communications Co. v. Crow Creek Sioux Tribal CourtDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2016
  3. Penn Mart Realty Co. v. U. S. Financial Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 1975
  4. Phillips v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
  5. Hein v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API