Legal Opinion

In the Interest of E.T.C.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 15, 2004No. ED 83716PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PATRICIA L. COHEN, Judge.

Introduction

Ellen Mary Behan-Carter (“Mother”) and Lance E. Carter (“Father”) appeal the Findings/Recommendations, Order, Judgment and Decree of the Family Court of St. Louis County terminating their parental rights as to their minor child, E.T.C. (“Child”).1 We affirm.

Statement of the Facts and Proceedings Below

Pursuant to section 211.031 RSMo 2000,2 a juvenile officer filed a Petition alleging that Mother neglected or refused to provide for Child’s education. The Petition noted that Father did not have primary physical custody of Child during the referenced school…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  2. In the Interest of M.D.R.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2004
  3. L.R.K v. Greene County Juvenile OfficeMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003
  4. Campbell v. R.L.O.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2002
  5. In the Interest of D.B. v. L.B.A.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1996

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Juvenile Officer of St. Louis County v. M.W.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2013
  2. In the Interest of A.A.T.N.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2005
  3. In the Interest of K.K.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. In the Interest D.L.W.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2012
  5. In the Interest of: D.A.B. and B.M.S.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2019

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API